Subject	The In/Outs may be bigger but they still flow through
Posted by	madscientist222 on November 22, 2011 at 7:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 189 times.
In Reply To	Negative posted by MrOzzie5183 on November 22, 2011 at 07:16 PM
Message	an IC core, which will have an impact on flow. The Massive ICs themselves IIRC flow around 425CFM, while these 54mm TBs flow 450cfm. Tack on feet of intake piping and you bring the overall flow rate down even more, below the capability of the 54mm TB.
Follow Ups	Flow bench results from 54mm TB vs stock - Rob'Z 18:00:59 11/22/11 I'm ready for the 65's :) (n/m) - jlag 18:44:57 11/22/11 So 54mm outflows the Massives? - madscientist222 18:55:54 11/22/11 Negative - MrOzzie5183 19:16:11 11/22/11 The In/Outs may be bigger but they still flow through - madscientist222 19:56:15 11/22/11 If you can make it a little bigger, I'm game... - SimaYi 20:45:00 11/22/11 You need to consider the pressure drop that they were flowed - black300zx 19:45:26 11/22/11 Arent you confusing pressure drop with flow pressure? - madscientist222 19:51:00 11/22/11 I didn't choose the number - Rob'Z 21:06:42 11/22/11 Sounds like a case of mistaken units... - Jim (Selin Design) 23:37:21 11/22/11 Re: Mistaken units? Rob'Z in in/hg, ahs's in in/H2O? - Obeeone 09:26:08 11/23/11 How so? - Jim (Selin Design) 10:57:27 11/23/11 You are correct Jim - Rob'Z 20:15:19 11/23/11 Thinking of bottlenecking in this way is misleading... - Jim (Selin Design) 23:49:47 11/22/11 And the current is tested in a 1 volt circuit - not4resaleZ 10:07:49 11/23/11 Great job , those numbers are nice . Now if you can get - Xteam300TT (South Tx ) 19:13:55 11/22/11 They seal like OEM - Rob'Z 21:05:21 11/22/11 I am not sure 65 will fit. - ConVerTT 20:34:49 11/22/11 Yeah, after closer inspection - Rob'Z 18:13:39 11/23/11 Nice work Rob! (n/m) - Piranha 21:12:51 11/22/11 Nice! (n/m) - BoneZ (MD) 22:13:20 11/22/11 What's the residual thickness of the tube wall? - ZXoltan 04:44:10 11/23/11 The wall should be fine, it's as thick as the IC piping - Rob'Z 18:11:11 11/23/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.